Legal

This section shall not be used for discussions of the legal system in general, and how to reform it, but solely for information concerning my own legal situation and history.  For general discussions of the law and its application, I plan to introduce a section on The Law.

Introduction

The Gnostic mystic Samael Aun Weor says, in his book The Three Mountains, that the sign of the first spiritual initiation is being jailed for something that you did not do.  If that is true, then perhaps I passed that initiation in 2005.

I have been accused of many things.  But I have never been found guilty of any crime, other than when I pled guilty to traffic tickets.  At the current time, there is a warrant for my arrest for serial murder, for killing people by removing their organs and transplanting them into other people.  Sounds horrific, doesn’t it?  There has even been a 60 Minutes investigation about me, supposedly showing that I am committing fraud.  So, do we believe the accusations, or do we look at the facts?

One of the tools that the Powers That Be frequently use to neutralize their opponents is the public false accusation.  Because of the power of the media, which they control, there is no need to follow up with a trial; the accusation itself results in the trial in public opinion, and the neutralization of their opponent.  Witness, for example, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, who is in legal limbo in the Ecuadorian embassy in London.  Assange is fighting extradition to Sweden by England, with strong pressure from the USA.  His alleged crime in Sweden?  Rape of 2 women, both of whom have publicly stated that sex with him was consensual.

And then, there is Dominique Strauss-Kahn, the former chief of their International Monetary Fund.  In 2011, he was accused of sexually attacking a chambermaid in a New York hotel.  His passport was confiscated, so that he could not leave the US, an investigation was begun, in which the maid was found to have told her boyfriend that they were going to become rich.  Within a period of about a month, all charges were dismissed, but he was replaced as the IMF head, and permanently labeled as a sex criminal. (Incidentally, under the new IMF head, IMF technocrats soon replaced the elected presidents of two nations, Italy and Greece.)  No trial, no proof were needed. In the court of public opinion, controlled by the media of the PTB, Dominique Strauss-Kahn has been found guilty, sentenced, and sentence administered.  Without benefit of the nuisance of an actual legal trial that just might reveal the truth, and with no possible means of defending himself, he has been permanently removed from any effective role in society for the rest of his life.

A detailed example of how the Illuminati, American medical establishment, and the CIA infiltrated, took over, and destroyed the effectiveness and the mission of the Church of Scientology, which they control to this day, is found in this long interview.

[Leaders were discussing] these outrageous things that were happening to water down and misuse techniques; and not using the organization’s system to deal with disagreements or discover who did what, not using it correctly, misusing it in kangaroo courts of judgment in which people were “declared evil” in the Scientology terminology, an ostracism.

But if you fought it, they would plant drugs on you or call your friends, family, employers and harass you. This misuse of justice had been creeping in for some years, but at the Mission Holder meeting at Flag, the system completely collapsed.

They isolated the highest producers and most respected leaders in the organization and labeled them as having had criminal behavior. They had to pay penance either in hard work or labor for doing all these “evil” things. ….

I believe Ron Hubbard had the most dangerous information of anybody in this century, and for a time was a major target and enemy of the Illuminati. More resources were put into taking him down and his knowledge out of the public domain and using it for their destructive purposes than any other fight that they had at that time

That is the way that those who control the system work.  And those of us who oppose the system need to be aware of that.  This can, and will, happen to you or someone you know.  In my own case, I have many times been relieved of participation in important projects, dismissed from jobs, stripped of state licensure, banished from relationships and society, based not on the result of the findings of any constitutional court in the world, but solely on the basis of well-contrived accusations.  No trial, no proof were needed.   No victim, no accuser, no crime.   No possible means of defense, and I was effectively and permanently removed from being an effective participant in benefiting the world.

The Drug Dealer

In 2004, I was medical director of three different alternative healing centers in a southern state.   Patients in these clinics received acupuncture and chiropractic care from licensed practitioners, and I provided medical evaluations and medical care, including authorized medical procedures.  These procedures (mostly EDTA chelation therapy and intravenous nutritional therapies) took place under my license by trained Intravenous Therapy Technicians, who were trained nurses, EMTs, or chiropractors who had been extensively trained before I met them.

Although this was all perfectly legal, it was considered (by the state licensing boards) professionally inappropriate for a medical doctor to work with a chiropractor.  An investigator from the state chiropractic board showed up at my office and asked me to help him to censure one of my chiropractic partners, who was considered to be stepping outside of the limits of his practice by working with me.  I was told that I needed to protect the privileges of my medical license by not allowing other professionals to work with me.  When I laughed at this investigator and showed him the door, the rebound was that I was attacked directly by the system.

In one of the clinics, I was offering pro bono care to a woman who was addicted to prescription drugs.  My acupuncturist, who had run a drug detoxification clinic in another state, was providing the addiction therapy, and I provided tapering doses of the medications that she was addicted to.  She was making progress under this plan, and we coordinated with her family and friends to support her healing.  When my partner the acupuncturist, in apparent excellent health in his early 50s, did not come to work one day, we found him dead in his apartment.  No cause of death was ever found.  Since then, it has occurred to me that this death may have not been due to natural causes.

Without the support of the acupuncture for her addiction, our patient lost control of her medications.  I was forced to either discharge her from my care, or to dole out her medications in small quantities, to get her through a few days or a week at a time.  Apparently this change in her prescription pattern, from one weekly prescription to several small prescriptions in a week, set off some alarm bells at the pharmacy control board.

In this time of relapse, this patient also lost her home.  Being chivalrous, but not well trained in addictions management, I foolishly offered to let her stay in a spare room in my apartment for a short time.  During that time, she found a blank prescription pad in my home and forged a prescription.  This was recognized at the local Wal-Mart pharmacy, narcotics police were called, and she was apprehended.

The police told her that they did not want to arrest her, but they wanted to use her to set me up.  After they had accumulated a record of 12 small prescriptions being filled for this patient over a few months, they arrested me at one of the clinics, and sent me to jail.  During in-processing, I saw an investigator from the medical licensing board in the room with the narcotics police.  There is no question that this was a coordinated attack by the state licensure system to control a physician who tried to work “outside the box”, by running an integrated healing center.

The charges against me were 12 counts of “unauthorized distribution of a controlled substance”.   I was released on bail, and hired a lawyer to defend me.  He accepted several thousand dollars, but didn’t do anything.  Several months later, my bail was revoked, and I was sent to county jail to await trial.

At this point, I asked my new state appointed defense attorney how I could be charged with “unauthorized distribution of a controlled substance” when I held two narcotics license, one state, one federal?    After some consideration, he filed a motion to dismiss the charges based on that question.  The motion sat on the judge’s desk for months, as she had been elected on a “Get Tough on Drugs” campaign, and apparently did not want to look lenient.

Judges are required to act on a motion within 90 days, so at about day 85, this judge passed my case to another judge, who quickly dismissed all the charges and released me from jail.  89 days in jail, all charges dismissed.

Sexual Deviate

I was out of jail, but the system was not done with me.  My medical license was suspended, and the medical board required me to receive an evaluation by a psychiatrist.  I was informed that this was a routine matter, that they did that to all physicians who they were investigating.  And by the way, I could not go to a psychiatrist of my own choosing, I had to go to one which they had selected.  He wasn’t even in the same state!  And he had a business relationship with one of the medical board members, a definite conflict of interest!  This business was that the medical board referred doctors to him, and he had the exclusive right to evaluate and treat them until the medical board decided that they had had enough.  He thus had a monopoly, total control, on the life of any doctor the medical board wanted to control.

This psychiatrist’s name is Gene Abel.  Dr. Abel has some rather unusual beliefs.  The first one is that one out of 20 men are pedophiles.  Five percent!   And to come up with that number, he believes that he has created his own test for sexual aberration.  He gives the examinee a computer mouse, and flashes photographs of people on the screen.  He determines somehow from this whether or not you are a pedophile.  There are no wires to test the evaluee, no galvanic skin response sensors or brain wave or heart beat monitor or penile tumescence probes.  Just a computer mouse.  And one out of twenty people apparently fail his test!

Furthermore, Abel’s own evaluations show that among confessed pedophiles evaluated with this test, 24% evaluated as normal.  So, we have here a test which (in my opinion) vastly overestimates the number of pedophiles in the US at 5%, yet misses 24% of those who are admitted pedophiles!  Of what use would such a test be?  Dr. Abel’s test was excluded from evidence in US District Courts based on the Daubert Principle, which says that an expert witness must meet 4 criteria, which he did not meet.  (Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 US 579, 113 SCt 2786, 125 LEd 2d 469 (1993). United States v. White Horse, 2001 DSD 38, Gerard Ready v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Suffolk County Superior Court, Civil Action no. 00-10390 SDP (May 17, 2002) – Ruling on the Commonwealths Motion to Exclude the Abel Assessment for Sexual Interest.)

Another of his beliefs is that the sexual deviance which he diagnoses with his flashing photos can be treated with the discredited sexual aversion therapy.  This therapy, in which, for example, a photo of a naked man is shown to a homosexual while giving the patient either an electrical shock or a medication to make him vomit, was shown decades prior to be not only ineffective, but to be severely damaging to the psyche, resulting in many suicides.  (Council on Scientific Affairs of the American Medical Association, “Aversion therapy,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 258, no. 18 (November 13), 1987, pp. 2562-2565.) Yet, this system of testing and treatment is the only one acceptable to the state medical board, which chooses to farm its doctors out to another state, because no one in their own state would consider providing such a program!

Not surprisingly, Dr. Abel’s perversion test is not accepted in the psychiatric community, nor in the courts.  In fact, Dr. Abel is specifically prohibited from testifying in US District courts!   Yet, he is THE ONLY psychiatrist allowed to evaluate doctors in the state in which I was practicing!  Does this make any sense to you?  Not unless you consider the possibility that the examinations of this doctor are a total sham, and function only to provide a means to control or punish doctors who step out of the Big Pharma, Big Legal box.  Like me.

So, I underwent two separate hearings before the medical boards.  I had a lawyer present for the first one.  He joked around with the medical board lawyers, with whom he obviously already had a relationship, but he didn’t do anything else.  At my second hearing, he didn’t even bother to show up!  And it was at the second hearing that I was presented with the report of Dr. Abel, who declared that I am a sexual deviate, and unfit for the practice of medicine.  Not only did I fail his spurious test, he also claimed that I admitted to molesting a young girl.  I admit that this struck me totally speechless!  I had no idea that this was coming, and in any case, there was nothing I could do or say to rebut that!  Contrary to the rules of the hearing, I was allowed no opportunity to cross examine any witness.  When I pointed out that there was no evidence against me, only hearsay such as this report, which is not admissible in court,  and specifically against the rules of evidence for this proceeding, the lawyer conducting the proceedings told me “Oh, we use hearsay all the time”.  I was permanently stripped of my medical license in that state, and before long, that action was echoed in all of the other states in which I was licensed.

And by the way, that business relationship between Dr. Abel and the member of the state medical board: It is about the “Impaired physicians program”, where an attempt Is made to use Dr. Abel’s aversive therapies to rehabilitate “impaired physicians” (as defined by Dr. Abel, and by no one else).  The ironic thing is that I was not even offered a chance to become one of the guinea pigs in that program!  If I was truly this “impaired physician”, why would they not have offered to admit me into their program?  As I see it, they wanted no chance that I might somehow complete the torture program and regain my license!

The rules of the medical board specifically state that the findings of the board are sensitive confidential information, and by state law are to be kept confidential and not to be disclosed to anyone.  But are we surprised to discover that the medical board prominently broadcast the sexual allegations on several television stations, and to this day posts the findings on their website?  All of these actions were illegal, but entirely consistent with the theory that this entire action had nothing to do with my fitness for the practice of medicine, but was only contrived to destroy me professionally, and to serve as an example to anyone else who might dare step out of the medical box.

Fraud

There is as yet no legal action against me in this case, at least none that I know of, but I include it here because 15 million people probably saw the allegations, and that much notoriety deserves to be addressed.  The reader will please understand that in light of other legal action currently underway, I may have to be less transparent than I would otherwise prefer to be.

Since the practice of medicine in the United States was no longer open to me, I did some private research on the production of stem cells from discarded medical waste, in the form of umbilical cords and placental tissue discarded after childbirth.  Umbilical cord blood stem cells were beginning to be used in the United States as a substitute for bone marrow transplant in cases of leukemia or other cancers.  In other countries, the same stem cells had been used to treat a wide variety of disorders, often with significant success, but their use has been problematic in the United States.   I was offered a job creating a stem cell laboratory in South America, so I went there and set up the lab, studying protocols for the safe and efficient production of stem cells from afterbirth tissues.

Meanwhile, in the United States, the wife of a lawyer in a southern state gave birth to twins.  One of them was normal and healthy, but the other one had significant brain damage, apparently from birth-related hypoxia (lack of oxygen).  The medical personnel involved in the case circled the wagons against the angry and litigious lawyer, as did a medical review board, which found no evidence of malpractice on which to base a successful legal action.

But the child was significantly damaged.  He had cerebral palsy with limited motor movement, significantly decreased mental abilities, and he was cortically blind.  That means that he was blind, not due to any defect in his eyes, but due to brain damage.

The distraught and angry family searched for something that could help their son.  They found that there were clinics in Mexico which treated anoxic brain injuries with injections of umbilical cord stem cells and umbilical cord blood stem cells, and they took their son to Mexico to see if such therapy might help him.  In all, they took him to Mexico for three different treatments.

A month or so after one of the treatments, the boy surprised the family by following a ball with his eyes.  This was the first evidence that he had ever given of being able to see.  The family took him to see an eye specialist, who said that the boy could see, but not well, but he would probably need glasses.

The overjoyed father began spreading the news about the success that their son had had from stem cells.  He was on at least 4 television stations and 4 newspapers telling his story, and even made a trip to Washington to testify before Congress about his experience with his son regaining sight through stem cells.

Sometime later, I was contacted by this lawyer.  The lawyer said that the stem cells had worked for his son in the past, that they were the same kind of stem cells that I was researching in my lab, and that he wanted his son to have more stem cell treatments.  He said that it was very difficult for him to travel to either Mexico or South America, so he wanted to have the contact information for a doctor in the United States who was treating people with stem cells.

As it turns out, 60 Minutes admits that the lawyer contacted us BECAUSE CBS ASKED THEM TO!  Why?  To create another piece of AMBUSH JOURNALISM, for which 60 Minutes is so famous.  Entertainment, to dumb down the masses, paid for by Lipitor (Pfizer).  Not because we somehow were pulling the wool over the eyes of the lawyer and his family.  Only because 60 Minutes wanted to pillory someone for their show.

My lab had received many suspicious phone calls in the past several years, and it appeared to us that some governmental agency was gathering information about our lab.  The conversations were very stilted, sometimes bizarre, and the agents contacting us did not act like real patients with real problems.  We even had one agent who failed to disconnect the call from his new cell phone, and left the call active for almost an hour while he bragged to his co-workers how good he was at fooling us.  So, we were a bit suspicious of many of our phone calls for information, and were always hesitant to jeopardize those brave physicians who were willing to leave the drug-oriented, Big Pharma controlled medical system for a natural therapy using nutrition, herbs, and possibly stem cells.

So, we refused to refer this lawyer to any physicians, but did send his information to some of our physicians to see if they wanted to contact the patient’s family.  None of them did.  I suspect that if they knew he was a lawyer, they would have been even less likely to do so!

After weeks of pleading from this father, I presented the theoretical possibility that someone who was not licensed in the United States might, under private contract, and operating without the statutes of a state, provide the stem cells to his son.  The lawyer apparently understood the legal strategy, and said that he was quite willing to operate under a non-licensed private contract.  We then began to discuss how many stem cells would be ideal in this situation.  I suggested that a small amount of stem cells might be used to see if it would be effective, and that we would charge only a minimal amount for the stem cells ($2500, which was our cost).  The father said that cost was not a concern, and that we should provide as many stem cells as would be optimum to give the best chance of improvement.  We eventually decided on an amount which was four times my initial suggestion, at our full price, or $20,000.  (Of course price was not an issue for him, since the guy was not planning to pay us anything.  But the more that they could say we charged for the stem cells, the worse it would appear to the sheeple who watch the show.)  I made a contract for him to sign, which included risks and possible benefits, and offered to review all of the provisions.  In the meantime, with an FDA registration to import stem cells into the United States, I procured some stem cells, and took the frozen live cells into his state, and arranged an appointment to go over all of the final details with him.  I got a signed copy of the contract from him, and arranged to meet him at his exclusive club for brunch.

I was ushered into a large suite in the penthouse of a hotel tower, told that we had missed brunch, but offered a spread of fruits and juices.  He then said that he was going to get his wife.  As I refreshed myself, around a partition came not his wife, but Scott Pelley, the CBS news anchor and host of 60 Minutes.  He expected me to run, and I saw that they had cameras now at the elevators outside the door to record my retreat.  But I chose to stay and try to use the opportunity to enlighten people about the promise of stem cells for medical treatments.

Our interview lasted about 35 minutes, of which about 4 were actually used on television.  As expected, most of what I said, of course, was simply omitted from the broadcast segment, and the rest of my words were twisted, taken out of context, and generally distorted.  You can see a response to the broadcast segment HERE.  Some important points follow:

  • The investigation, its subsequent broadcast, and webpage, were paid for by a large drug company, Pfizer, which I am told is owned mostly by the Bush family.
  • There was never any intent in finding out the truth about stem cell therapy.  The purpose of the program was to defame me, and poke fun at anyone who thinks that stem cell therapy is available now. 
  • The broadcast segment claims that I knew that my stem cells are worthless, and medically ineffective, and that my only intent was to defraud the lawyer and his family.
  • The broadcast segment totally ignores the history that the boy had received successful treatment with stem cells in the past.
  • CBS had arranged to purchase some stem cells from us several months prior.  These stem cells were sent to a doctor at Duke University who is sponsored by Pfizer, and has a stem cell transplantation program at Duke.  The Pelley said on the broadcast segment that the stem cells were all dead, “biological waste”, but this contradicts what he told me on camera at the time, which was that there were 100,000 live cells when they were received at Duke.  This is contradicted by our own testing of the cells prior to shipment, which showed that there were 500,000 live cells in the shipment.
  • The Duke University doctor is shown on the broadcast segment saying that there is no medical use for stem cells in the treatment of cerebral palsy or anoxic brain injury. 
    • Yet that same physician had, by the time of the broadcast, herself treated MORE THAN 150 CHILDREN WITH CEREBRAL PALSY using umbilical cord blood derived stem cells, and many of those cases resulted in significant improvements.
  •  It would appear to me that this Pfizer-paid doctor who lied about the use and effectiveness of stem cell therapy for cerebral palsy was likely to also lie about the amount of stem cells received from us, and also their quality.  Since she only works with cord blood derived stem cells, and she ordered from us umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells, she likely has no ability to judge the status of these cells.
  • Within a short time of the 60 Minutes broadcast, legal attacks against stem cell clinics had been launched in several countries, including China, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, and Ecuador.  This suggests to me that this whole investigation was part of an organized attempt to defame and discredit stem cells and the doctors who prescribe them.

As I excused myself from the interview and left the penthouse suite, there was a cameraman right outside the door, who filmed me from as close as six inches from my face as I waited at the elevator bank.  Obviously, he was violating my personal space in an attempt to trigger a response from me which he could then flaunt before the millions of salivating viewers.  I was tracked through the building by three separate camera crews which made sure to show that I was leaving the ambush site.  Even the very act of leaving seems to have a negative connotation, at least if the editors spin it to the maximum effect!

I highly recommend that you read my full response to this 60 Minutes segment.

Serial Killer!

Shortly after the broadcast of the 60 Minutes segment in the USA, a series of defamatory newspaper articles and television stories began airing in South America.  Most of these articles used the CBS program as a basis for their stories, but these stories distorted things even more than did the CBS story.   My business partner in the stem cell lab had entertained a journalist a few months prior, who interviewed him about stem cells for 35 minutes.  He had been hired by 60 Minutes, via a local newspaper, to find incriminating evidence about us.  He did not find anything incriminating, so they did not use any of his material on the 60 minutes show, except for a still photograph of our house!

Several months after this hubbub had died down, on 6 April 2011, our home was raided by more than 40 police, many in full combat gear, and lawyers.  They occupied our home for almost a month before they let us come back home.  Our business has been shut down since then.  They had come because of anonymous tips which said that we were killing babies, smuggling guns and drugs, and Peruvians.  Needless to say, no guns, drugs, dead babies or Peruvians were found.  An investigation was held by the District Attorney’s office with the approval of a Judge, and all of the strange allegations were cleared.  Later on, the case was ordered closed by the judge. The room in our home, with tens of thousands of dollars’ worth of supplies and equipment, was sealed, so we were not able to conduct any alleged business or research.

Over a year later our home was raided again, this time with 5 SWAT police, several plain clothes police, about 5 lawyers and some “experts”.   Charges this time were murder of multiple babies, as well as murder of other people in removing their organs and transplanting them.  Of course, this was totally against the constitution of the country, which prohibits being tried twice on the same charges.  In fact, in the course of this investigation, the police and DA have violated every single right guaranteed by the constitution of this nation, save one, the right to maintain silence.

Once again, there was no evidence to support any of the charges, but most of our alleged laboratory equipment was confiscated, valuable personal items (gold and silver coins and other things) were stolen, the seal was replaced on the door, and my friend was required to report to court for arraignment on those charges again.  The district attorney wanted to put him in prison pending the investigation being completed, but fortunately the judge ruled that this was not necessary.  They just took his passport, and required him to check in at the office of the DA every 15 days.  By law, the DA only had 90 days to complete his investigation. That was about 6 months ago, 6 months during which my partner would have been rotting in jail while this DA tries desperately to find something which does not exist.

After about 4 months, the DA realized that he is going to have to wrap up his investigation, as he had already far exceeded the time legally allotted to him.  He has over 1300 pages of “evidence”, none of which gives any indication that we have killed any babies, done any transplantation or removal of “organs”, broken any laws, or that there is even any biological materials at all in our alleged laboratory.  So, he decides that he will add my name to the investigation.  I found out about it beforehand, and left the country, hiding out in another country. That was 3 months ago.  There is a warrant for my arrest on the same charges.  No evidence to support any of the charges, but still, there is a warrant, and they want to put me in jail indefinitely, just as they wanted to put my friend in jail.

Each time a new defendant is added to our case, the prosecution gains another 30 days for their investigation.  One of the many local doctors who collected discarded afterbirth tissues has been indicted, and there is a long list of our business contacts to drag this out indefinitely.   Did he do anything illegal?  No, and there is no evidence that he did.  Did he do anything immoral?  What, pass on garbage to have it recycled?  In what way would that be deemed immoral?

Did we break any laws?  There were no laws regarding stem cells, or transplantation of stem cells, at the time that our alleged laboratory was allegedly operating.  Today, there is a law about organ transplantation, but it was not in effect at the time that our alleged laboratory was allegedly operating.  In any case, this new law specifically exempts blood or blood products, and its definition of “organ” does not include toenails or hair or any body part which grows back.  Like, for example, placentas and umbilical cords.  And the sources of the stem cells which we were interested in were, blood (which is specifically exempted), and umbilical cords, which not only are medical waste, but they are exempted as something which can regrow.

This persecution has already been going on for almost two years.  They have no evidence of any crime, and no legal basis for their actions, but every month, they add another party to my “crime”, and obtain another 30 days.  Thus, the case continues indefinitely, and I cannot go home.   And now, they have permanently damaged my international police record by listing this information with INTERPOL.

At a recent presidential debate, 4 of the candidates complained about the practice of the government, whenever it is involved in a case, of ignoring the rights of the defendants. So, this is common practice from the entire judicial system.

We heard from an inside source that someone at the federal level of the government is repeatedly pushing this DA to put us away.  Why?  We don’t know.  We could assume that it is the Big Pharma wanting to keep us down.  We could assume that the PTB are worried about letting us be effective.  But that would just be guessing.

We did hear a story that there apparently have been cases of murders involving theft of human organs, that a truck full of organs and dismembered human bodies was found headed toward the border, so there is a huge secret attempt by the government to find those responsible.  But is that real?  Does that make sense?  The maximum time that human organs can be used is about 24 hours—if there is a truck full of them, that suggests that there will be a huge surgical team on the other side of the border ready to receive these organs and transplant them into all of the people who are waiting for them, and that just doesn’t make sense to me.  This would require a whole medical industry, with hospitals, and twenty or more teams of surgeons, anesthetists, operating rooms, nurses, etc., all on standby for the truck full of organs to arrive!   And, of course, all the recipients would have to be on site, waiting, as well.

Could the organs be useful for something else?  Cannibalism?  Shrunken heads?  Who knows?

Another possibility is that the DA, who is a known Illuminati connection, might be aware that there have been ritualistic murders in the area.  If he is aware of these murders, but his memories about his own participation in them has been distorted, he may actually be thinking that he is doing something good by trying to shut down the murderers.  Unfortunately, he has decided, against all evidence to the contrary, that we are those murderers.

Another theory is that there is a kidnapping ring which is wants to kidnap us and get our family members to pay a ransom.  It is not at all clear to me how this would fit into this investigation, but we do have evidence that such a ring exists, that such kidnapping rings exist in many Latin American countries, that this one involves many of the individuals and governmental agencies who are involved with our persecution, and that there are several Illuminati connections involved with this ring.

When my friend asked for advice from the US Consular officer, the consular officer laughed.  He said that he has been posted in several consulates in several countries, and for some reason, Americans keep being accused of stealing organs, even though there is never any evidence of such a crime.

So, how can you help?  We would be grateful for information about what is really going on here.   We may choose in the near future to kick off an international protest against this persecution, and we may ask for your participation at that time.  Our lawyers are very patient in waiting for payment, but we would like to give them at least a little money for legal fees.  We also currently have no way to make a living, so contributions to our sustenance would be greatly appreciated.

We are also collecting names of those who are interested in advancing the cause of Global Genius Trust, either in the future for pay, or now as a volunteer or for deferred payment.  You can contact us at info@ggtrust.com

And, if you would like to support us with a contribution, Click Here.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s